Landmark Transfer Pricing Case from South Africa

Marking a significant milestone in South Africa’s legal landscape, TRM Tax Attorneys achieved a groundbreaking victory in one of the nation’s inaugural transfer pricing trials.

Under the astute guidance of Dr. Daniel N. Erasmus, TRM Tax Attorneys represented a prominent conglomerate embroiled in a dispute concerning the arm’s length nature of royalty rates charged by the holding company to its subsidiary for the utilization of intellectual property.

The Tax Court evaluated the testimony of four expert witnesses who delved into the intricacies of the Profit Split Method (PSM) and Comparable Uncontrolled Price Method (CUP). Ultimately, the court ruled in favour of the taxpayer. Notably, the court determined that the CUP cited by the taxpayer served as a valid internal comparable.

This victory is a testament to the diligent support and expertise of esteemed counsels Adv Wim Trengove SC and Adv Rudolf Mastenbroek.

For further insights:


Dr. Daniel N. Erasmus’s Upcoming Contributions

In his upcoming book, Conducting a TP Trial, Dr. Daniel N. Erasmus expands on the team’s extensive experience in dealing with complex Transfer Pricing Trials in a variety of jurisdictions.

His work promises to be an essential resource for legal practitioners and multinational corporations, offering deep insights into the strategic considerations and legal frameworks surrounding transfer pricing trials.

Related Articles

Czech Republic vs RR Donnelley Transfer Pricing Case

The case Czech Republic vs. RR Donnelley Czech s.r.o. revolved around a transfer pricing dispute concerning the application of Section 23(7) of the Czech Income Tax Act (ITA). The core issue was whether RR Donnelley Czech s.r.o. had correctly applied the arm’s length principle in a transaction involving the purchase of hard disk drives (HDDs) on behalf of Banta Ireland, a related entity.

France vs SAS Roger Vivier: TRANSFER PRICING CASE

The judgment revolves around a tax dispute between SAS Roger Vivier Paris, a distributor of luxury goods, and the French tax authorities. The core issue concerns transfer pricing adjustments made for the financial years 2012–2014, with the tax authorities asserting that SAS Roger Vivier Paris indirectly transferred profits to foreign-related parties in non-arm’s length conditions.