Navigating Treaty Dynamics: Insights from Postgraduate Diploma in International Tax Q&A Session

For International Tax professionals, understanding the intricacies of treaties is paramount. Recently, a Q&A session with the Academy of Tax Law’s Postgraduate Diploma in International Tax students delved into pressing questions concerning treaty renegotiation, the impact of EU membership without OECD affiliation, and the repercussions of Brexit on the UK’s treaty network. Below is an overview of the discussions, enriched by the insights of my esteemed co-lecturer, Renier van Rensburg.

Understanding Treaties: A Brief Overview

Treaties are formal agreements between sovereign states, serving as foundational instruments in international relations. They delineate rights and obligations, fostering cooperation across various domains, including taxation, trade, and defence. The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) provides the legal framework for treaty creation, interpretation, and termination, underscoring their significance in maintaining global order.


Question 1: Treaty Renegotiation Amidst Conflict and Sanctions

Question

Treaties take a long time to renegotiate or cancel. How does this work in cases of conflict between countries and in cases of sanctions being imposed?

Overview

Renegotiating or terminating treaties during conflicts or under sanctions is a multifaceted process governed by international law, particularly the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT) 1969. The approach varies based on the nature of the treaty—bilateral or multilateral—and the specific circumstances prompting potential suspension or termination.

My Thoughts

Treaties are designed for long-term stability and are not easily terminated. In conflicts, treaties may be suspended but can also serve as negotiation tools. Sanctions can override treaties, particularly in trade and tax agreements. While the VCLT offers a legal framework for treaty disputes, political considerations often play a dominant role.

View the recorded video and full answer here.


Question 2: EU Membership Without OECD Affiliation and Treaty Implications

Question

If a country is part of the European Union but not a member of the OECD, does this affect any treaties being entered into?

Overview

Yes, a country’s EU membership, while not being an OECD member, does affect treaty negotiations and enforcement, particularly in tax, trade, investment, and regulatory frameworks. The European Union’s supranational authority means that EU treaties and directives often override or shape the country’s ability to negotiate independently.

My Thoughts

While EU membership dominates treaty negotiations, non-OECD EU countries still engage in international tax and trade agreements. However, their treaties must align with EU directives, limiting their autonomy in treaty-making.

View the recorded video and full answer here.


Question 3: Brexit’s Impact on the UK’s Treaty Network

Question

Did Brexit affect the UK’s treaty network?

Overview

Yes, Brexit significantly impacted the UK’s treaty network across trade, tax, investment, and regulatory cooperation. As the UK was previously covered under EU agreements, Brexit necessitated renegotiation or modification of numerous treaties.

My Thoughts

Brexit redefined the UK’s treaty network, requiring independent negotiations. While trade and tax treaties largely remained, financial services and investment agreements saw significant changes. The UK continues to align with OECD tax standards but faces new barriers in EU-related treaties.

View the recorded video and full answer here.


RESOURCES

There is an extensive library of questions and answers posted by our students which is available on the Academy of Tax Law website and our YouTube Channel:

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@academyoftaxlaw

Q&A Library: https://academyoftaxlaw.com/tax-knowledge-base/

For more information of all our Postgraduate programmes please send an email to info@academyoftaxlaw.com or click here to view our programmes.

Related Articles

France vs SAS Roger Vivier: TRANSFER PRICING CASE

The judgment revolves around a tax dispute between SAS Roger Vivier Paris, a distributor of luxury goods, and the French tax authorities. The core issue concerns transfer pricing adjustments made for the financial years 2012–2014, with the tax authorities asserting that SAS Roger Vivier Paris indirectly transferred profits to foreign-related parties in non-arm’s length conditions.