Global Trends in Transfer Pricing Disputes and Their Impact on African Multinational Enterprises

I am honoured to be opening the 13th Annual Africa Transfer Pricing Summit in Cape Town on 12 September, where I will present on the topic of “Trends in Transfer Pricing Disputes.” As multinational enterprises (MNEs) increasingly operate across borders, particularly in developing regions like Africa, transfer pricing has emerged as one of the most significant and challenging areas of tax compliance. Understanding global trends in transfer pricing disputes and how they impact Africa is essential for businesses navigating the complexities of regional tax regulations.

In this article, I will highlight part of what I will be discussing at the event, including the particular challenges MNEs face in Africa and how landmark cases, such as the first South African transfer pricing judgment in ABD vs CSARS, have shaped the local tax landscape.

At the summit, I will also join a panel discussion on the ABD vs CSARS case (in which I had the privilege of representing the taxpayer alongside a distinguished team of transfer pricing and legal experts). This discussion is scheduled for 13:45.

Both of my presentations will be recorded by SAIT and made available after the event for those unable to attend.

---

Global Trends in Transfer Pricing Disputes

The global landscape for transfer pricing (TP) disputes has evolved significantly over the past decade. With the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) initiative, countries worldwide have enhanced their transfer pricing regulations, emphasising the alignment of profits with the location of economic activity. This movement has significantly influenced the surge in TP disputes, with tax authorities becoming more aggressive in their audits.

Key Global Drivers of Transfer Pricing Disputes

1. Increased Regulatory Oversight: Tax authorities are more vigilant about ensuring that profits are taxed where value is created, leading to heightened scrutiny of MNEs’ transfer pricing policies. Developing nations, in particular, view TP adjustments as a vital revenue source.
2. Growing Complexity in Value Chains: As global business models become more complex, with intangible assets and services crossing borders, determining the correct arm’s length price becomes more challenging.
3. Digitalization and Intangibles: The rise of digital businesses and the role of intellectual property have made it difficult for tax authorities to determine how to allocate income properly. This has resulted in significant TP disputes, especially in tech and pharmaceutical industries.
4. Jurisdictional Variations in TP Rules: While the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines provide a global framework, countries have adopted their interpretations and methods, resulting in disputes over conflicting regulations.

Transfer Pricing Disputes in Africa

Africa has seen a sharp rise in transfer pricing disputes, driven by an increasing need for tax revenues, the complexity of transactions within MNEs, and evolving TP regulations across the continent. African countries are becoming more sophisticated in their approach to TP, which has resulted in a growing number of adjustments, audits, and court cases.

Challenges MNEs Face in Africa

1. Limited Resources for Effective TP Management: African tax authorities often lack the resources and expertise compared to developed countries, resulting in delayed audits and inconsistent application of TP rules. This creates uncertainty for MNEs operating in the region.
2. Inconsistent Legislation and Compliance Burden: TP laws vary significantly across African nations. MNEs often find it difficult to comply with each country’s specific requirements, leading to potential disputes.
3. Aggressive Revenue Collection Tactics: Given the reliance of many African economies on corporate taxes, tax authorities tend to adopt an aggressive stance in auditing and disputing transfer pricing arrangements, often focusing on MNEs as lucrative targets for revenue generation.
4. Inadequate Documentation and Local Knowledge: Many African subsidiaries of MNEs struggle to maintain proper TP documentation. Without accurate documentation, it becomes difficult for companies to defend their TP policies during audits or disputes.

Case Study: ABD vs CSARS – The First South African TP Judgment

The case of ABD vs CSARSin South Africa marked a significant moment in African TP litigation. This was the first transfer pricing case to reach the courts in South Africa, and it provides valuable insights into how tax authorities and courts approach TP disputes in the region.

In this case, the South African Revenue Service (SARS) challenged the pricing of a loan between a South African company (ABD) and its foreign parent. SARS argued that the interest rate charged was not arm’s length and, as a result, attempted to adjust the income of the South African company.

Our team, representing ABD, successfully demonstrated that the transaction was appropriately priced under the arm’s length principle. This case set a precedent for applying the arm’s length principle in financial transactions within South Africa, emphasizing the importance of robust TP documentation and expert representation in defending against TP adjustments.

The Value of Transfer Pricing Expertise in Disputes

Transfer pricing expertise is critical in avoiding costly and time-consuming disputes. MNEs facing TP challenges benefit significantly from expert advice that can guide them through documentation requirements, audits, and potential litigation. TP specialists can help ensure that transactions comply with local regulations, mitigating the risk of adjustments and penalties.

1. Preventing Disputes with Proper Documentation: Proper transfer pricing documentation is the cornerstone of defending against TP disputes. Detailed and accurate documentation helps MNEs justify their pricing strategies during audits and in court. Experts in TP can guide MNEs on how to maintain robust records.
2. Expert Testimony in Litigation: When disputes escalate to litigation, TP experts provide invaluable testimony, ensuring that complex economic and tax concepts are presented clearly and persuasively in court.
3. Advising on Compliance with Local Laws: Given the diversity of TP regulations across African nations, having local TP expertise ensures that MNEs are compliant with the specific rules of each jurisdiction in which they operate.

Avoiding TP Disputes Through Tax Risk Management

The best way to manage TP disputes is to prevent them from occurring in the first place. One way to achieve this is through the implementation of a robust tax risk management process, including the establishment of a tax steering committee.

The Importance of a Tax Steering Committee

A tax steering committee is a cross-functional group of individuals within an MNE that oversees the company’s tax strategy and risk management efforts. This committee ensures that the company has a comprehensive understanding of its tax risks and implements appropriate measures to mitigate those risks.

1. Proactive Identification of Risks: A tax steering committee helps identify potential TP risks before they materialize into disputes. By closely monitoring changes in tax legislation and assessing the company’s compliance, the committee can address any issues before tax authorities raise concerns.
2. Holistic Approach to Tax Strategy: Transfer pricing is just one component of an MNE’s overall tax strategy. A tax steering committee ensures that TP policies align with the broader corporate tax strategy, reducing the risk of inconsistencies that could lead to disputes.
3. Regular Review and Documentation: Through regular reviews of TP policies and documentation, the steering committee ensures that the company’s TP practices remain defensible. This reduces the likelihood of disputes and strengthens the company’s position if an audit occurs.

For more detailed insights on the importance of a tax steering committee in preventing TP disputes, visit Tax Risk Management.

IN SUMMARY

Transfer pricing disputes continue to grow in complexity and frequency across the globe, and Africa is no exception. MNEs operating in Africa face unique challenges due to regulatory variations, aggressive tax authorities, and limited local expertise. However, by investing in transfer pricing expertise and implementing a proactive tax risk management process, including a tax steering committee, MNEs can significantly reduce the likelihood of disputes and better manage any that arise.

The lessons learned from landmark cases such as ABD vs CSARS emphasize the importance of proper documentation, local knowledge, and expert representation in successfully defending against TP adjustments. As the African tax landscape continues to evolve, MNEs must remain vigilant in aligning their TP policies with local regulations to avoid costly disputes.